• City Dawn

    One of my favourite poems is In Praise of Cities by Thom Gunn. I have loved spending time in many cities in my life: Glasgow, Manchester, Edinburgh, London, Washington, Bordeaux, Paris, Vienna, Barcelona, Rome, Venice, Copenhagen, and others.

    As a youngster, I would travel by rail and often arrive in a town or city in the early morning. Ah, resting at Atocha Station before escaping to the streets…

    Once, I landed at Barcelona in the early hours and slept in the airport until taking the first bus or train into the quiet, waking city. It was a great privilege to walk the calm, peaceful, Las Ramblas in the cool of morning.

    Seeking cool also, we would drive from wherever we were staying in Tuscany to arrive in Siena early. Il Campo is magical in the early light, almost tourist-free, the waiters setting up, pastries – bomboloni! – deliciously fresh.

    Thom Gunn’s poem considers the city as a whole, its disorder, its strangeness, its changing heartbeat, but it is the morning that he has captured:

    Only at dawn,
    You might escape, she sleeps then for an hour:
    Watch where she hardly breathes, spread out and cool,
    Her pavements desolate in the dim dry air.

    Do read the whole poem. The last four lines are magnificent in a different way. It also cries out to be read aloud: see how gently stretched is that line ‘she sleeps then for an hour’ and ‘Watch where she hardly breathes’, and the perfect alliteration of the letter d in that last line.

    Gally Maxwell
    5 May 2024


    Leave a Reply

  • How to Create the Next Renaissance

    On Elle Griffin’s excellent website, The Elysian, there is a writing prompt for May 2024:

    How do we create the next Renaissance?

    Added to this is:

    How can we fund the next Renaissance? How can we create a world where artists are better funded and thus create more art?

    Contributions can be in any form.

    Mine is a story, The Great Docility, available on my Short Stories page.

    Enjoy.

    Gally Maxwell
    5 May 2024


    Leave a Reply

  • Books and Life, Again

    “Let us spend our leisure with our books, which will take our minds off these troubles, and will teach us to despise what many people desire.”

    Written in the 15th century.

    Poggio Bracciolini, quoted in Greenblatt, Stephen. The Swerve: How the Renaissance Began (p. 162). Random House. Kindle Edition.


    Leave a Reply

  • “How I rose from humble origins to complete disaster.”

    Herzog by Saul Bellow – A Review

    Vladimir Nabokov said that one cannot read a book.

    What do we readers make of that?

    He said you can only re-read it.

    I’ve read Herzog at least four times and always find newness, insights I had not noticed, observations that only make sense now because of my age.

    Herzog is a book for life.

    Moses Elkanah Herzog, an academic who might have had a bright professional future, is now a pitiful figure. He has fallen for the considerable charms of the formidable Madeleine Pontritter, they have married, they have an adorable pre-schooler girl, Junie, and Mady has planned a secret campaign, with military precision, to expel him from her life and enable her to continue a relationship with a close friend of Moses, the one-legged Valentine Gersbach who, superbly, “walked on a wooden leg, gracefully bending and straightening like a gondolier.”[2]

    Mady persuades Moses to resign his professorship to work on his great book project. They they move to a dilapidated country house near a village, Ludeyville, in an empty part of Massachusetts. Here, we works at and fails with his madly broad subject, his book that will demonstrate:

    “a new angle on the modern condition, showing how life could be lived by renewing universal connections; overturning the last of the Romantic errors about the uniqueness of the Self; revising the old Western, Faustian ideology; investigating the social meaning of Nothingness. And more.”[3]

    The world needs him, he believes:

    “This was where such as he came in. The progress of civilization – indeed, the survival of civilization – depended on the successes of Moses E. Herzog.”[4]

    Mady does not want to be married to a failure. She had expected Moses to succeed. After a year, she wants to study in Chicago. Moses looks for jobs for himself and for Valentine – and here he should have been suspicious – at Madeleine’s insistence. She feels that they cannot leave Valentine and his wife Phoebe alone in the mountains. After a year in Chicago, she divorces Moses and he finds himself under terrible strain, particularly when he realises that Madeleine is in love with Valentine and everything has been set up in advance to enable her to evict him and have her lover spend time at her home:

    “And life was very bad in Ludeyville – terrible, I admit. But then didn’t we buy the house because she wanted to, and move out when she wanted to? And didn’t I make all the arrangements, even for the Gersbachs – so we could all leave the Berkshires together?”[5]

    Devastated, Moses wanders to Europe (mentioned only in occasional flashbacks), but the core of the story is his picaresque rambling between New York, Massachusetts and Chicago, all the while writing strange letters. He has a new woman friend in NYC, the viscerally real and adorable Ramona, “sexually, a natural masterpiece”[6]; we hear about his first wife, Daisy (and their son Marco), and, working away from home for a year, how he adulterously “shacked up with Sono Oguki,”[7] leading Daisy to ask sarcastically when he came home, “How’s Japan?” And his fling with Wanda in Warsaw.

    Herzog himself feels “The paltriness of these sexual struggles.”[8]

    One great joy of the book is, as ever with Bellow, the cast of breathing (often with halitosis, one imagines), smelling, shouting, extraordinary, visceral, diverse, and divisive characters, particularly Mady of course, but also Ramona, plus the magnificent “reality-instructors,” often lawyers, who don’t hold back on their opinions about Moses or his case. After advising him not to claim custody of Junie, his lawyer Sandor Himmelstein – “That’s right. She won’t even know you next time you see her” – becomes enraged over an insurance policy that Moses does not want:

    “The small mustache bristled, a fierce green, milky poison rose to his eyes; his mouth twisted. ‘I’m getting out of this case!’ Himmelstein began to scream.

    ‘What’s the matter with you?’ Herzog said. ‘Where’s Beatrice? Beatrice!’

    But Mrs Himmelstein only shut her bedroom door.

    ‘She’ll go to a shyster firm!’

    ‘For God’s sake, stop screaming.’

    ‘They’ll kill you.’

    ‘Sandor, quit this.’

    ‘Put you over a barrel. Tear your hide off.’

    Herzog held his ears. ‘I can’t stand it.’

    ‘Tie your guts in knots. Sonofabitch. They’ll put a meter on your nose, and charge you for breathing. You’ll be locked up back and front. Then you’ll think about death. You’ll pray for it. A coffin will look better to you than a sports car.’[9]

    Amongst several of these fierce lessons, a softer episode is important. The tenderness between Moses and Junie when he takes her for the day and they visit the Aquarium is touching and necessary: to contrast with bizarre adult life. Unfortunately, it does not end well, Mady coming to the police station to collect the child.

    And Mady is the towering presence in this story. Inimitable, irresistible, emotionally violent, she is simply monstrously magnificent. Bellow gorgeously illustrates Madeleine’s dominant temperament and her strength in one of the finest passages I have read in Bellow, when she has prepared herself to tell Moses the marriage is over, relishing her power while disingenuously denying it:

    “She had prepared the event with a certain theatrical genius of her own. She wore black stockings, high heels, a lavender dress with Indian brocade from Central America. She had on her opal earrings, her bracelets, and she was perfumed; her hair was combed with a new, clean part and her large eyelids shone with a bluish cosmetic. Her eyes were blue but the depth of the color was curiously affected by the variable tinge of the whites. Her nose, which descended in a straight elegant line from her brows, worked slightly when she was peculiarly stirred. To Herzog even this tic was precious. precious. There was a flavor of subjugation in his love for Madeleine. Since she was domineering, and since he loved her, he had to accept the flavor that was given. In this confrontation in the untidy parlor, two kinds of egotism were present, and Herzog from his sofa in New York now contemplated them – hers in triumph (she had prepared a great moment, she was about to do what she longed most to do, strike a blow) and his egotism in abeyance, all converted into passivity. What he was about to suffer, he deserved; he had sinned long and hard; he had earned it. This was it.[10]

    …She was saying, ‘We can’t live together any more.’

    Her speech continued for several minutes. Her sentences were well formed. This speech had been rehearsed and it seemed also that he had been waiting for the performance to begin.

    Theirs was not a marriage that could last. Madeleine had never loved him. She was telling him that. ‘It’s painful to have to say I never loved you. I never will love you, either,’ she said. ‘So there’s no point in going on.’

    Herzog said, ‘I do love you, Madeleine.’

    Step by step, Madeleine rose in distinction, in brilliance, in insight. Her color grew very rich, and her brows, and that Byzantine nose of hers, rose, moved; her blue eyes gained by the flush that kept deepening, rising from her chest and her throat. She was in an ecstasy of consciousness. It occurred to Herzog that she had beaten him so badly, her pride was so fully satisfied, that there was an overflow of strength into her intelligence. He realized that he was witnessing one of the very greatest moments of her life.

    You should hold on to that feeling,’ she said. ‘I believe it’s true. You do love me. But I think you also understand what a humiliation it is to me to admit defeat in this marriage. I’ve put all I had into it. I’m crushed by this.’

    Crushed? She had never looked more glorious.”[11] 

     

    Moses has no chance against such power.

    When we consider ourselves and Moses’s predicament, Bellow chides us to remember a great, sad truth:

    “Herzog momentarily joined the objective world in looking down on himself. He too could smile at Herzog and despise him. But there still remained the fact. I am Herzog. I have to be that man. There is no one else to do it.”[12]

    Moses exacerbates this mess of his life. With Junie, he crashes the car, emerging from unconsciousness to see that the police have found the (loaded) revolver that he was carrying. He seeks refuge in the house by Ludeyville.

    There, there might just be peace. A late outburst is a letter to Nietzsche:

    “No, really, Herr Nietzsche, I have great admiration for you. Sympathy. You want to make concerts and lectures, its liberalism and its romantic theatrical ‘loves’ and ‘passions’ – it all deserves to die, it will die. Okay. Still, your extremists must survive. No survival, no Amor Fati. Your immoralists also eat meat. They ride the bus. They are only the most bus-sick travelers. Humankind lives mainly upon perverted ideas. Perverted, your ideas are no better than those of the Christianity you condemn. Any philosopher who wants to keep his contact with mankind should pervert his own system in advance to see how it will really look a few decades after adoption. I send you greetings from this mere border of grassy temporal light, and wish you happiness, wherever you are. Yours, under the veil of Maya, M.E.H.”[13]

    Insofar as he can, Moses is gradually coming to terms with his situation. He can see that:

    “His state was too strange, this mixture of clairvoyance and spleen, esprit de l’escalier, noble inspirations, poetry and nonsense, ideas, hyperesthesia – wandering about like this, hearing forceful but indefinite music within, seeing things, violet fringes about the clearest objects. His mind was like that cistern, soft pure water sealed under the iron lid but not entirely safe to drink. No, he was better occupied painting the piano for the child.”[14]

    He decides to stop writing letters, and there is a peace in the silencing. The joy of letting go, of silence for those of words – writers, but also lawyers, and many others – is not a new insight, but it remains profound. I remain deeply indebted to Thom Gunn’s For a Birthday, which begins, ‘I have reached a time when words no longer help’.

    Herzog, the man and the novel, is a riot of words. Moses is no Everyman. He is very much the man he has to be. But, like him, however different our circumstances and outlook, we all face the truth of our life: There is no one else to do it.

    Gally Maxwell
    4 May 2024


    [1] The quotation in the title is at 158 of Bellow, Saul. Herzog (Penguin Modern Classics) Penguin Books Ltd. Kindle Edition.

    [2] Page 5. This is so superb a description that Bellow uses it again later (p200), and rightly so. He is aware of the repetition, having Moses’s listener say that he has said this before.

    [3] Page 40-41. And see p78.

    [4] Page129.

    [5] Page 41.

    [6] Page 68.

    [7] Page 106.

    [8] Page 5.

    [9] Pages 90-91.

    [10] Page 9.

    [11] Pages 9-10.

    [12] Page 69.

    [13] Pages 334-335.

    [14] Pages 339-340.


    Leave a Reply

  • Freedom is a Hooray Word…

    Daily writing prompt
    What does freedom mean to you?

    Freedom is a hooray word. By way of contrasting example, “oppression” is a boo word.

    Who can disagree with Freedom? [Well, the victims of a vicious criminal who is to be unexpectedly “freed” often do.]

    The danger is that words become emptied of real content.

    Freedom obviously means being free to do, or not do, something. There is no such thing as complete freedom because unless you want to be solitary and become a hermit, or totally self-reliant in a wilderness, you enjoy benefits and obligations. Duty to a partner or children to parents. Duty not to commit crime. The benefits of a clean water supply and a safe road network. And a duty to pay tax to help maintain them.

    It then becomes detail and politics. An argument about taxation and how it is spent.

    I feel as free as I can be while being restricted by criminal law and many other laws. Some of those laws are stupid and should be abolished: that’s the detail, and getting rid of them is the politics.

    My tax records will show a very big income for the government from me, but I don’t feel as I’ve ever paid tax.

    Why not? I’ve been employed and “tax” and “National Insurance” in the UK are paid over by the employer. If you are offered a job at £100,000 a year, you take off say £28,000 for these payments, leaving your actual pay at £6,000 per month. That’s the pay you have really been offered.

    I would pay more tax on that basis. Arguably, I don’t pay tax at all. I enter into a contract with my employer that, when either of us works it out, means I get £72,000 per year and my employer has to pay £28,000 to the government, supposedly on my behalf, but what the hell.

    I’ve paid money to the authorities twice. Once when I received a fee from research done with a University, £3,000 and once when the tax office failed to update my records and I had underpaid. From that experience, I can see how much harder it must be for the self-employed to cough up money they have already received. That’s Kahneman-Tversky, if I am remembering right, about humans hating actual losses.

    Then comes the argument (detail and politics) about how much the government should collect in tax. What should it pay for?

    No one is free if they are penniless, homeless or seriously ill. Society fails a commitment to freedom if it does not help such people. Universal healthcare and financial support that enable people to live are fundamentals. Infrastructure and defence (argue about how much, of course = politics) too. Courts, police, unavoidable.

    Education of children is in theory less unavoidable – they will still live and enjoy their childhood! – but not providng education is utterly stupid in the end for them and for the whole country.

    I am free to move around as I wish – although Brexit punched an emotional hole in that. I can eat, read, watch, listen, to my heart’s content without (much) censorship. Private sex that hurts no one is finally beyond the law in most respects. I have the freedom to go to a public place and not be choked by carcinogenic smoke.

    Joseph Stiglitz has recently been quoting Isaiah Berlin. Here is the full, referenced quote:

    “Both liberty and equality are among the primary goals pursued by human beings throughout many centuries; but total liberty for wolves is death to the lambs, total liberty of the powerful, the gifted, is not compatible with the rights to a decent existence of the weak and the less gifted.”*

    Stories of refugees from Europe in WW2 – their rejection in a time of demonstrable, dire, existential need – have haunted me ever since I learned what happened. I know immigration policy is a nightmare: the richer countries cannot simply accept large numbers of people from elsewhere. But I empathised with the stories, mostly by Jewish people fleeing or wanting to flee Germany of course, wondering if it could happen to me and my family. Later, I illustrated this to my young stepkids with an impossible example. “I’m Scottish and if it ever splits with England, I might be arrested in the night and deported.” They were wide-eyed.

    How ridiculous that scenario seemed. But the UK is not as united now as it was then. And Ukrainian children were no doubt shocked – impossible in modern Europe! – when they were attacked and many became refugees. As were former Yugoslavs. And are Polish people next, then the Baltic states, Austria… Germany, France, UK…?

    All of us: think about how it would feel to escape horror and find nowhere to rest and work and love. Think about having no money, no home, no healthcare. Read and watch Nomadland.

    * Isaiah Berlin, The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas, p13 (2013, 2nd Ed., Henry Hardy; Intro by John Banville). Princeton University Press

    Gally Maxwell
    3 May 2024


    Leave a Reply

  • Black is white or Brown is Green…

    Clarks shoes, Chagall, and the Conservatives (Fake News…)

    The French on this shoebox says This box is green.

    But it’s brown! [Looks a bit grey but that’s the light, because it’s a very dull day here in the wastes of the south of the UK.]

    Look like Clarks is channeling its inner Marc Chagall.

    Famously, the words are “This is not a pipe.” What does Chagall mean? Well, for starters, it’s not a pipe, it’s a painting. And you are not looking at a pipe or a painting, but at a photograph, indeed an electronic copy of a photograph.

    Seems like the increasingly insane Conservative Party in the UK is following suit with legislation that “Rwanda is safe” because Parliament has said so; when Rwanda is not safe.

    Surreal (literally)…

    BTW, on the Clarks box, the smaller wording is “We are committed to reducing our footprint”.

    Pardon? Well, that’s easy: make only smaller shoes.

    Gally Maxwell
    2 May 2024 (updated 4 May)


    Leave a Reply

  • Fight For Your Life – Quote of the day

    You have to fight for your life. That’s the chief condition on which you hold it.

    Saul Bellow (1964) Herzog. Penguin Modern Classics (2019). Kindle Edition, p19.

    Gally Maxwell
    1 May 2024


    Leave a Reply

  • Humorous Story from Earthly Powers

    A doctor in British Empire Malaya, mid-1920s, tells a brief story when a dinner guest opts for a sherry:

    “Of course.” He reached for the bottle of Amontillado on the sideboard and laughed. “The man before me, O’Toole, he had a Chinese kuki. Drank like a fish, brandy mostly. O’Toole had to keep his bottles locked up. Except the sherry, which he kept in the icebox. Well, he found the level of the sherry going down a little day by day so O’Toole thought he’d have some sport with his kuki, so he peed in the bottle day by day, just enough to restore the loss. But the loss continued so eventually he tackled his kuki and accused him of getting at the bottle. The kuki denied it, said he didn’t like sherry, too weak, not like good old brandy. Well, asked O’Toole, what’s been happening to it then? Oh, said the kuki, every day I put just a little in the soup.”

    Anthony Burgess (1981) Earthly Powers. London: Penguin, 246-247.

    As for the word “kiki”, a PhD thesis tells us it means “cook” in this context:

    “The colonial community in the Malay and Borneo states and Singapore were encouraged to learn ‘kitchen’ Malay with the publication of Malay for Mems. Author Maye Wood declares that the ‘object of this little book is to place before newcomers, especially women, the most ordinary and necessary words and phrases required in household management’. Using her own personal experience, Wood included vocabulary and phrases that she deems are ‘the most useful’ and ‘the most generally required’. The contents of this ‘phrase book’ are illuminating, the section which Wood entitles ‘Easy sentences on ordinary themes’ comprise mainly commands and imperatives. Here are some examples:

    On cooking:

    Call the cook                                          Panggil kuki

    Conversation with the cook:

    Tell the cook to come here                 Kasi tau kuki k’mari”

    Cecilia Yun Sen Leong-Salobir (2009) Representation and Role of Servants in India, Malaysia and Singapore, c.1858-1963. PhD thesis, University of Western Australia, 153-154. Available here.

    Gally Maxwell
    1 May 2024


    Leave a Reply

  • Glittering…

    Daily writing prompt
    What is your career plan?

    To enjoy the glittering career I have … behind me.

    Gally Maxwell
    1 May 2024


    Leave a Reply

  • Dangerous Public Figure

    Daily writing prompt
    What public figure do you disagree with the most?

    I wondered where to start. Putin is up there. All non-centric Conservative Party MPs? The Loony Right in the USA?

    I decided to focus on who is the most dangerous to us all, by which I mean the whole world.

    When I was small and surprised, as little ones sometimes are, by passing wind, my mother, grandmothers, aunties, used to say, ‘Who’s a Trumpy-bum today?’ Trump meaning, well, the passing of wind.

    The Orange Don, the Donald, the putative Dictator, Donald Trumpy-Bum threatens to destroy America’s democracy with knock-on effects all over the world, Europe not least. The alignment of Russia and China is far more dangerous than that of Germany, Italy, and Japan in WW2. If Trump lets Putin have his head, Goodbye freedom, hello war and oppression.

    Just saying…

    Gally Maxwell
    1 May 2024


    Leave a Reply